<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/feed/rss/commentaires/" />
	<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<description>a blog about Debian and self-hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>PluXml</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Let's Encrypt: threat or opportunity to other certificate authorities? - Written by Chris Siebenmann @ friday 15 april 2016, 18:10</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460743826-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460743826-1</guid>
		<description>In the short term, I think that commercial CAs will be mostly unaffected due to the short duration of LE certificates. In the long run a lot of software will probably handle them automatically, but for now you have to put together an automation solution for it and it&amp;#039;s easier (and potentially less time) to just pay &amp;lt;X&amp;gt; to a commercial CA for a N year certificate.

There&amp;#039;s also an existing commercial CA that offers free DV certificates, and they don&amp;#039;t seem to have killed the businesses of the other CAs. This isn&amp;#039;t quite the same setup as LE because LE has automated issuing (which is much nicer than wrestling with a CA&amp;#039;s terrible website), but it does suggest that many certificate buyers are not that price sensitive.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Siebenmann</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Let's Encrypt: threat or opportunity to other certificate authorities? - Written by Tanguy @ friday 15 april 2016, 14:59</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460732395-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460732395-1</guid>
		<description>@Martin: Apparently, they do not plan to, but they do not exclude that possibility either. I wonder what you could be doing that requires that, but anyway, this is a perfect example of a service a commercial CA could provide using the ACME protocol!</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tanguy</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Let's Encrypt: threat or opportunity to other certificate authorities? - Written by Martin @ friday 15 april 2016, 14:45</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460731506-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article146/letsencrypt-opportunity-other-cas/#c1460731506-1</guid>
		<description>I desperately need wildcard certificates for one of my sites. I hope that LE will support them at some point.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
	</item>
		<title>Tanguy Ortolo - Let's Encrypt: threat or opportunity to other certificate authorities? - Comments</title> 
</channel>
</rss>