<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/feed/rss/commentaires/" />
	<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<description>a blog about Debian and self-hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>PluXml</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Np237 @ monday 17 november 2014, 23:48</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1416268095-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1416268095-1</guid>
		<description>Systemd does not support keyscripts because they are not compatible with the way it interacts with the console. This use case is covered by the password agent, which is an entirely different concept:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PasswordAgents/

And again, I’m not saying this won’t cause problems. It will. Your keyscripts will not magically be replaced upon upgrades. From my research, this is the most significant incompatibility between sysvinit and systemd in Debian, and this is something that could have been better dealt with.

It is certainly one of the best reasons to keep sysvinit fully working for the timeframe of the jessie release. But it is something that will eventually be replaced without any significant impact on functionality and usability. In the long term, it is not a reason for keeping sysvinit available.</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Np237</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Arno @ monday 17 november 2014, 10:10</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1416219014-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1416219014-1</guid>
		<description>There is also #618862, about missing keyscript support for cryptsetup. It puzzles me that that bug is known for 3 years yet is not marked RC, especially since it appears systemd-sysv will be pushed on dist-upgrade (#758825) as well.

Adding to that the newer kernel&amp;#039;s requirement to add hid_generic to initramfs before usb keyboards will work, I see a high risk of hard to recover boot failures.</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arno</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Chris Cunningham @ friday 14 november 2014, 11:48</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415965710-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415965710-1</guid>
		<description>Did someone really say udev was something that Debian always had? And this someone is anti-systemd? Back in the day, udev itself was the Horrible Non-Unixy Devouring Horror that all the neckbeards were categorically opposed to. Now not even the most sociopathic curmudgeon (and there are plenty of them in the community) opposes it.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cunningham</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Np237 @ friday 14 november 2014, 08:50</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415955030-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415955030-1</guid>
		<description>@Ritesh Raj Sarraf

What limitations?
Does the current script not work with systemd?

Can udev alone associate the startup of services associated with the discovery of iSCSI or LVM devices?</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Np237</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Ritesh Raj Sarraf @ friday 14 november 2014, 06:29</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415946570-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415946570-1</guid>
		<description>@Np237

We always had the mechanism to trap events. It is called udev. There is no strong reason to push it to init. Fine grained udev rules always did the job.

In its current form, systemd brings more limitations than features for the use cases I&amp;#039;ve listed.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ritesh Raj Sarraf</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Np237 @ thursday 13 november 2014, 16:37</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415896649-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415896649-1</guid>
		<description>As for iSCSI, Multipath, LVM and the like, these kind of tools are precisely the reason why we need an init system that can manage events. It is sysvinit which is fundamentally deficient in handling dynamically discovered devices.</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Np237</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by Ritesh Raj Sarraf @ thursday 13 november 2014, 16:26</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415896004-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415896004-1</guid>
		<description>Like you, I got auto-spammed on that blog. I&amp;#039;ll put some I know rightway here.

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-iscsi/open-iscsi.git/tree/debian/umountiscsi.sh.init

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-iscsi/open-iscsi.git/tree/debian/open-iscsi.init

http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-lvm/multipath-tools.git/tree/debian/multipath-tools.init

I&amp;#039;d be interested to know how they could be adapted to systemd without a sub-shell script.</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ritesh Raj Sarraf</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Re: About choice - Written by al @ thursday 13 november 2014, 14:41</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415889690-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article133/re-about-choice/#c1415889690-1</guid>
		<description>Yours is a wishlist bug... just like this one

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758902

/s</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2014 14:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>al</dc:creator>
	</item>
		<title>Tanguy Ortolo - Re: About choice - Comments</title> 
</channel>
</rss>