<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/feed/rss/commentaires/" />
	<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter</link>
	<language>en</language>
	<description>a blog about Debian and self-hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>PluXml</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Looking for an SPF milter - Written by Andrew @ monday 16 february 2015, 06:00</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1424066400-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1424066400-1</guid>
		<description>I&amp;#039;ve been using smf-spf since 2007, and it works fine on sendmail 8.14.4 (current version) on Amazon Linux.</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Looking for an SPF milter - Written by Scott P @ friday 04 october 2013, 01:44</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1380851068-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1380851068-1</guid>
		<description>smf-spf looks the most promising, but I can&amp;#039;t get it to work with Sendmail 8.14.7 (smfi_register keeps tossing a version mismatch)</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2013 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott P</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Looking for an SPF milter - Written by Markus @ wednesday 12 june 2013, 13:36</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1371044191-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1371044191-1</guid>
		<description>Yes ... the SPF milter situation is more than frustrating. There&amp;#039;s nothing, which is still active or at least remotely working out of the box.

I&amp;#039;m beginning to think, I&amp;#039;m the only one out there, who&amp;#039;s still using sendmail ...</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Looking for an SPF milter - Written by ScottK @ friday 07 june 2013, 17:17</title> 
		<link>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1370625458-1</link>
		<guid>https://tanguy.ortolo.eu/blog/article103/spf-milter/#c1370625458-1</guid>
		<description>If you&amp;#039;re using postfix, us a policy service for SPF.  postfix-policyd-spf-python supports the authentication-results header field you need for opendmarc to work and is what I used to test opendmarc when I packaged it.

spf-milter-python is probably the easiest milter to get to do what you need for DMARC.  It doesn&amp;#039;t support authentication-results (but none of the milters do), but with python-authres, it ought to be easy enough to add.  If you insist on a milter, that&amp;#039;s probably the way to go.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ScottK</dc:creator>
	</item>
		<title>Tanguy Ortolo - Looking for an SPF milter - Comments</title> 
</channel>
</rss>